@@ -12,14 +14,16 @@ |
Otherwise, the consensus principle is almost universally applied. But not quite. In California, at least, decisions about whether a meeting is to be a smoking or a non-smoking meeting, as consciousness changed on this issue, have sometimes come down to majority voting. Johnson |
(1987:443) observed two majority votes on this at successive meetings of a group, in a situation complete with meeting-stacking and other manipulations reminiscent of party politics. |
|
- |
+---- |
+!Quelle: |
Robin Room, |
Addiction Research Foundation: Alcoholics Anonymous as a Social Movement |
|
p. 167-187 in: Barbara S. McCrady and William R. Miller, eds., Research on Alcoholics |
Anonymous: Opportunities and Alternatives. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies, 1993. |
|
----- |
+Siehe auch: |
+ |
http://area53aa.org/main/gsrs-and-groups/gsr-school/gsr-school-informed-group-conscience/ |
|
---- |
| |